![]() Basically, there are 2 main objectives: costs and risks. ![]() So I would suggest you ask first what are the objectives of the group supporting Fortify. But it also embarks a plugin mechanism enabling the community to. As such, Sonar provides code analyzers, reporting tools, defects hunting modules and TimeMachine as core functionality. Sonar has been developed with a main objective in mind: make code quality management accessible to everyone with minimal effort. SonarQube is oriented toward maintainability, so not really the same game. Hello, I don't know Fortify, especially that I believe there are different Fortify products, but I understand this is a tool to detect security vulnerabilities. To unsubscribe from this list, please visit. With Regards, Masood - View this message in context: Sent from the SonarQube Users mailing list archive at. Although, I know there is a Fortify Plugin in SonarQube.) Any information will be helpful. ![]() (I have never use HP Fortify Tool, so finding difficult to showcase SonarQube feature over HP Fortify Tool. Can anybody give me some major advantage of SonarQube 4.0 over HP Fortify Tool. But in order to showcase its advantage to one of our group over HP Fortify Tool, I need some expert comments for it. On Fri, at 8:22 AM, Masood wrote: Dear Team, We are using Sonar 4.0 for many projects. Cast Software Vs Sonarqube Plugin Rating: 8,8/10 5419votes
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |